Underlying Instagram’s decision is the cost of streaming videos.
Videos that have a higher resolution or contain lots of visual assets such as edits, images or other clips can demand more computing power to encode.
These will typically be larger in size than videos in a smaller resolution, meaning they require more storage space on servers.
And one person said in response to Mr Mosseri’s post, external they understood the benefits of potentially reducing storage cost, but it did not outweigh the negatives.
“From a creator’s perspective, spending time on creating high quality content just for it to be downgraded to low resolution sucks,” they said.
In May, Instagram announced changes to its system for recommending content, particularly video, to “give all creators a more equal chance of breaking through”.
However, Mr Navarra said he agreed with Mr Mosseri’s assertion – when responding , externalto user concerns about the impact on smaller creators – that people will always value a video’s content over its quality.
He said creators should focus on how they can make engaging content that caters to their audience, rather than be overly concerned by the possibility of its quality being degraded by Instagram.
Mr Mosseri clarified to users on Sunday that Instagram does not decide to reduce or improve the quality of individual videos, but rather does so in an “aggregate” way and on a “sliding scale” – adding he believed, external the difference in quality “isn’t huge”.
“The goal is to show people the highest quality content that we can,” he said in his initial video response.
The BBC has asked Instagram for more information.
The social media platform’s attempts to make video more key to its app experience have previously resulted in backlash from some users and creators.
In 2022 it reversed plans to shift further away from its traditional photo or so-called “grid” post format towards a TikTok-style focus on short form video content after it was criticised by creators and celebrities including Kylie Jenner.
